Monday, March 15, 2010

Education Week: Book Trains Critical Eye on AP Program's Impact

Education Week: Book Trains Critical Eye on AP Program's Impact
As someone who benefited greatly from AP science and calculus courses, I finished college in 3 years with a degree in mathematics. However, I worry about the push to AP over all others. The rankings that focus on AP as a proxy measure for a good high school seem terribly off, especially when they do not consider passing rates on the test. The test is the measure of the rigor of the AP course. If all of the students are failing the test, it is not really serving the AP purpose. The likelihood of the courses labeled AP as being "course-inflated" meaning a higher title than the actual content taught in the class, the less likely the courses will matter. As AP continues to scale up, it will need staffing that can support college-level curriculum taught in a high school context. I'm not sure we have the mass of teachers who can effectively pull off AP instruction, especially those teachers with other, often competing, demands to work with struggling students.

Tuesday, March 9, 2010

Success adds up for D.C. schools' math program - washingtonpost.com

Success adds up for D.C. schools' math program - washingtonpost.com - Interesting article on Everyday Math. I was just talking with an elementary teacher and potential doctoral student about the "spiral" curriculum of Everyday Math and how much it requires trust in one's colleagues to pick up things in the next grade and provide the appropriate foundation from the previous grade. I wonder how those teachers who "opt out" handle that trust issue, or if whole schools are opting out.

Found Math (from the MAA Focus) - Orthogonal


Mr. Friedman: I think that issue is entirely orthogonal to the
issue here because the Commonwealth is acknowledging —
Chief Justice Roberts: I’m sorry. Entirely what?
Mr. Friedman: Orthogonal. Right angle. Unrelated. Irrelevant.
Chief Justice Roberts: Oh.
Justice Scalia: What was that adjective? I liked that.
Mr. Friedman: Orthogonal.
Chief Justice Roberts: Orthogonal.
Mr. Friedman: Right, right.
Justice Scalia: Orthogonal, ooh.
Justice Kennedy: I knew this case presented us a problem.
Mr. Friedman: I should have — I probably should have said
Justice Scalia: I think we should use that in the opinion.
Mr. Friedman: I thought — I thought I had seen it before.
Justice Scalia: Or the dissent.
Mr. Friedman: Th at is a bit of professorship creeping in, I
suppose.
— Richard Friedman, arguing before the U.S. Supreme Court
in Briscoe v. Virginia
(Th anks to Deanna Haunsperger and Th e Volokh Conspiracy;
see http://volokh.com/2010/01/11/orthogonal-ooh/)

Sunday, March 7, 2010

Building a Better Teacher - NYTimes.com

This is a great article about teacher education and professional development. I hope policymakers and teacher educators pay attention. I think there is a need to blend both discipline-based and general pedagogical knowledge to build a better teacher. I also wish they would attend to developmental differences and how things work differently from elementary to high school. Worth a read. Building a Better Teacher - NYTimes.com